|
By Chris Rossini
We've seen the make-shift "fake news" list created by a leftist feminist professor. Well, another fake news list has been revealed and this one holds a lot more water. This list contains the culprits who told us that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and lied us into multiple bogus wars. These are the news sources that told us "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor." They told us that Hillary Clinton had a 98% of winning the election. They tell us in a never-ending loop that "The economy is in great shape!" This is the real Fake News List (and it's sourced):
270 Comments
Al Logan
11/19/2016 01:17:46 pm
Thanks for doing all of this work. Now the social media sites know where to look for false information.
Reply
Ace
11/19/2016 03:17:38 pm
She has a good point? What do you do Al Logan?... not a d*mn thing for someone else... im sure!
?
11/20/2016 10:07:40 am
Jerry
11/21/2016 04:03:43 pm
Absolutely sicko
Henry
11/21/2016 05:06:38 pm
I don't see one surprise on this list. I have been telling friends these outfits are evil. Truth sure avoids the Left.
Reginald Vernon
1/8/2017 03:58:37 pm
And are any of these good people tecruited, trained and paid by CIA, NSA, MI5 etc? In the U.K. it is well known that the BBC has 'connections' with both government and security services. 11/19/2016 04:19:54 pm
All I can say if Wow! Lots of surprises on this list.
Reply
Robert
11/19/2016 04:54:35 pm
I shut the tv off 1 1/2 years ago because I knew it was all a lie.
Max
11/19/2016 08:39:43 pm
Great work! We all knew and will always follow the truth and light. 11/20/2016 06:58:18 am
Surprises? Really, Carol? Then you are not listing or reading very closely.
Jon Falcone
11/20/2016 01:53:01 pm
u being sarcastic.. I hope.
I stopped watching TV in 2002.
Force Recon Marine
11/22/2016 10:28:51 am
Really where have you been??? or or you a product of socialist liberal progressive one dimensional regressive hypocritical politically correct socialistic lieberal idiot-ological indoctrination camps that masquerade as public schools producing intellectually morally bankrupt functionally illiterate automatons dependent on government and Lame Stream Media (LSM)
Gayle
11/19/2016 07:22:28 pm
Finally a voice - thank you for speaking out Ron. I watch Liberty Report and share it too.
Reply
JR
11/21/2016 12:05:25 am
You need to start thinking for yourself.
Beckey Neal
11/19/2016 08:41:32 pm
I don't trust any on this list and any off this list.
Reply
oz
11/21/2016 03:13:58 pm
word!
True news
11/19/2016 09:20:02 pm
lets link zerohedge with keyword "true news"... <laugh>
Reply
Lainey Jenkins
11/20/2016 02:06:45 am
Really???
Reply
11/20/2016 10:00:50 am
I came across a news Station, I never heard about.. Until AT&T CABLE STATION... CALLED ... OANN.. ONE AMERICAN NEWS NETWORK.. The only TRUTH AND FACTS YOU WANT TO HEAR.. LOVE THIS NEWS STATION..ALL NEWS REPORTERS ON OANN TELL IT LIKE IT IS.. 👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸❤️
Reply
Hillary for prison 2016
11/21/2016 06:08:25 am
Listen to AFR (American Family Radio) all the time and have never gotten a report that wasn't true.
Marilyn
11/22/2016 12:03:25 am
OANN is a wonderful news station. The ONLY one to watch for the truth.
Ralph Force
11/20/2016 11:23:32 am
I'm offended Calling these Corrupt people Journalist
Reply
Mike Emery
11/21/2016 10:21:44 am
Agreed, I thing there should have been a "?" After the word: journalists!
Watchdog
11/20/2016 12:14:54 pm
This list is compiled from an email published on Wikileaks and pertains to the list of reporters who were invited to a press dinner. The fact it is a screen pic littered with every credible news source in this country and with no way to click or follow links should make you more than a little wary of what is being propagated when you are reading it. These are highly credible news outlets backed by doing business by a code of ethics or they can be legally shut down. If the author who penned this article, Chris Rossini were doing ethical work his sources would be listed, credible and there would be a way to check his bio and the information that appears in the article posted here.
Reply
Viva Christo Rey!
11/20/2016 01:15:28 pm
Bull. It's common knowledge that these reporters and their respective affiliates do nothing but espouse the Democratic Party line and recite verbatim talking points provided by the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign machine (what's left of it ). They have zero credibility and should resign to make room for individuals who are dedicated to reporting the truth regardless of the consequences.
Nuuner
11/20/2016 02:28:00 pm
You keep telling yourself that Watchdog. Its neat you can pick any name you want on this site. If you watch or read the news, you may notice that almost every piece of "news" has an opinion of the reporter or the station/newspaper attached to it. This is called bias. Biased news is not news and is considered not credible. Research 101 at any local college will teach this. If more people educated themselves, the "news" would have been out of business years ago.
Nuuner
11/20/2016 03:19:46 pm
You keep telling yourself that Watchdog. Its neat you can pick any name you want on this site. If you watch or read the news, you may notice that almost every piece of "news" has an opinion of the reporter or the station/newspaper attached to it. This is called bias. Biased news is not news and is considered not credible. Research 101 at any local college will teach this. If more people educated themselves, the "news" would have been out of business years ago
stock
11/20/2016 04:16:49 pm
Bullcrap WAtchdog. The collusion with DNC is obvious, the Trump baching is obvious. You are either a PC idiot or a paid troll, possibly both.
Coba
11/20/2016 04:22:35 pm
Hahaha- that's too cute, Watchdog! You go watch your 'credible' news reports then, and keep a look out for the tooth fairy while you do so. When are you going to wake up and realize we aren't buying the BS you're selling anymore!
Daniel Huffman
11/20/2016 10:01:30 pm
Have you been living under a rock for the past year? None on this list including their employers can be called credible ever again. Most if not all should be tried for Treason and hung in public for trying to subvert our elections.
Nanette
11/20/2016 11:48:38 pm
Haa! Really, credible, only to progressive liberals. I have found they are just the list of state ran propaganda man stream media outlets! Most the time it was very easy to see through their lies, take a look people who owns these outlets and the top CEO's who they are married to and who are they linked to the Clintons and our current president! You fools, can't you ever look for truth? Paul has it correct, these so called "news" outlets are not journalist at all but propaganda stations. So of course FB, Google, Yahoo and others are really the masters at giving everyone faux news! They want to shut down any facts to come to light to the people, because what the propaganda main stream media did was hide the truth from Americans. They will try and take away out rights if it does not fit their narrative!
JR
11/21/2016 12:03:36 am
Don't speak to facts here, the commentators and author are pretty stupid people. They're upset that their favorite faketriots got listed on the Fake News List and so this is their version of 'revenge' by doing what they usually do, distort the facts to make themselves appear right and smart (which they aren't). I'm no liberal, but I'm absolutely disgusted with these f'ng idiots who have all abandoned all pretense of thinking for themselves. It's perfectly clear that they cannot do this and neither can the article of this hit piece. These people are true morons.
Hillary for prison 2016
11/21/2016 06:15:05 am
That is because you are to lazy to take to time to find out if they are corrupt or not. You are quit happy taking someone else word. Look at some of the reports they put out the research it. Your liberal mind might prove you wrong.
Duke
11/21/2016 08:44:47 am
May you choke on your own vomit 11/21/2016 10:56:42 am
yes, active links are needed in order for me to share this ....
Angela Beitling
11/21/2016 12:00:17 pm
2 Thumbs Up, Watchdog. Totally agree.
ALEX
11/21/2016 12:45:41 pm
Time to change from the 'Watchdog' to the 'Blind&DeafDog'... '...code of ethics...', indeed. Neither you, nor those you advocate for, even know the meaning of those words, you friggin' shill
Karen
11/21/2016 01:58:41 pm
Council on Foreign Relations members in good standing, no doubt.
JaspersPet
11/21/2016 04:29:28 pm
Seriously? Watchcat, you need to get your head out of the down under region you must be keeping it in!!
Critical Thinker
11/21/2016 06:21:02 pm
"Watchdog" has their leash on too tight. What you want to believe is credible are easily disproved consistently and have been for many years. The 1996 Telecommunications Act signed by Clinton was a fatal blow to the integrity of reporting and journalism in this country. It doesn't take much to realize we've been fed fantasies, disinfo, & misinfo for decades. The 'code of ethics' is as trustworthy as the FDA that lets big pharma poison us, the EPA, which allows us to be saturated with nuclear radioactivity, carcinogenic levels of RF and the crime of geoengineering. These all fit the globalist agenda, who these stations are OWNED by. Given the arrogant, condescending tone of "Watchdog", you can bet your last dollar that he's one of their shills working to secure your trust in their malevolent fairyland narrative.
coherent
11/22/2016 05:52:04 am
A watchdog ,you should be in the list.
Brian
11/22/2016 08:38:18 am
The "news outlets" have been bought and paid for before we were born! They have a financial weakness and a licensing need, think they can't be bought? WRONG!
Sandra Tulin
11/26/2016 11:09:14 am
I do not recognize wikileaks as a credible "source" anymore. Stolen information is the most suspect.
Michael
11/20/2016 03:22:15 pm
glad it's out in the open....The truth that is.
Reply
11/20/2016 09:28:12 pm
George stefukanopolous is #1 or maybe he's #2. Great list of who never to believe: ever.
Reply
Phil Cooper
11/21/2016 01:39:34 pm
That would be "George Steponallofus".
Samuel Pierce
11/21/2016 08:27:10 am
The left (wrong path) has their list, and now the right (right path) has our list. Interesting, no journalist was caught colluding with Donald J Trump. Thanks Ron Paul for preparing this list.
Reply
Jason Lopez
11/21/2016 10:38:00 am
He forgot Chris Matthews
Reply
JW
11/26/2016 04:42:22 pm
Or Wolff Blitzed!
ALEX
11/21/2016 11:13:59 am
THEY ARE TREASONISTS---AND TO THE GALLOWS WITH THEM AFTER A FAIR TRIAL--
Reply
Mohammed Cohen
11/21/2016 11:36:36 am
Everyone must remember the whores listed on this list of media prostitutes and never forget them. They all are the fake news masters paid and bought off by their employers who enable their high speed high price decadent life styles! These whores will sing and dance to their master's tune at any time and any place with their ordered dozens of masks they use as disguise. Now that the mainstream media is totally decimated of their own arrogant doings, they are now operating with a different mask to they keep their words of "leaving for good" for different countries and some "I'll leave for a different planrt" etc., but can't get off the gravy train of their masters.Journalist is dead in the West and whatever little remains among the alternative media is destined to be wringed out as the present nonsense Obogo clans are perpetrating as controlling the "fake news". So the uphill battle for the concerned and free-thinking citizen has just begun for the evil ways of the criminal mafia of the mainstream is gearing up with new and more lethal weapons
Reply
David Wilson
12/9/2016 09:52:16 pm
What do you have against prostitutes to demean them by comparing them to these 'journalists'? Prostitutes practice an honorable trade, and they are generally honest about their services. These 'journalists' should be compared to something else...banksters maybe?
Chilly Sharp
11/21/2016 12:28:53 pm
Are you nuts??? Talk about locking the fox IN the hen house. Your list presents such a marvelous example of why we all need to check sources. Claptrap.
Reply
Paula
11/21/2016 02:15:34 pm
Do not forget Andrea Mitchell. She was awful in her twisted reporting and obvious bias to Clinton.
Reply
Coyote Down
11/21/2016 04:15:43 pm
If you don't read the papers you're not informed - If you do read the papers then you're mis-informed.
Reply
linda anthony
11/21/2016 05:15:22 pm
Thanks for showing us the biased Media. Thank God I don't watch any of them and never would. They all smell like sewer rats and i boycott them all
Reply
linda anthony
11/21/2016 05:18:16 pm
Once again, the left media tries to keep us from learning and hearing the truth. Have boycotted these channels from day one.
Reply
11/21/2016 05:18:33 pm
It is GREAT to see the US and World finally waking up! Keep up the vitally important work of reporting the TRUTH. The PediPerves must be exposed and disposed of as well as all crooks who have let and caused this modern tragedy happen. Thank God for the internet and the many dedicated true news people. Keep up your great job / services to inform the millions of brain damaged, brain washed people. Thanks again. KRW
Reply
Al
11/21/2016 06:40:19 pm
Did we forget about the chemical shells we found in Iraq?
Reply
Armetta McGlothen
11/21/2016 07:19:39 pm
So why isn't fox news included? Anybody that sees through the real republican party they consider a problem when actually they end up being caught up, until they are held accountable they will continue down that destructive road until they face God's judgment..
Reply
Albert George Young.
11/21/2016 08:15:22 pm
There NO LAWS TO STOP THESE FAKES UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 😴🇺🇸🇺🇸
Reply
Craig Holtzman
11/23/2016 05:22:11 pm
The only real news that's anywhere near irrefutable is your local news reporting on local events that happened and discussed amongst your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Some cable news like earthquakes, volcanoes and such are believable. I don't believe 90% of the other crap!
Reply
faye
11/29/2016 09:53:36 am
... as if "those people" aren't already using these sources! Sheesh! Its actually more backup info for those of us who do not follow such drivel.
Reply
Joe
11/30/2016 10:03:09 am
Where's Fox ?
Reply
Steven Sharp
12/26/2016 11:31:58 pm
Thabk Dr. Paul. The propaganda wing of the shell of a party, the DNC should tread lightly. Afterall, fiscal 2017 is nigh.
Reply
Mike Shannon
11/19/2016 01:18:06 pm
How do I get to the page where the list of journalists are?
Reply
Helena
11/19/2016 06:38:44 pm
The list is the picture. If you Google it you may get the type you're looking for. :-) 💙💙
Reply
NC Powerlifter
11/20/2016 09:54:23 am
I believe he was making a joke and implying there are no journalists these days.
Tom Smyth
11/20/2016 01:20:14 pm
here is the post with the actual links to the wikileaks pages,you can update your article to make it better https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5cb4hl/drain_the_swamp_here_are_45_journalists_who_were/ … Got this off another page just in case the guy with the speech about not trusting Ron.
Reply
jill
11/21/2016 04:35:30 pm
doubters can copy and past the url and go to an active site, where they can click on the Wikileaks, DNCLeak or Daily Caller to check the sources...but most doubters doubt because that is their desire, and will not check the sources...their doubts may be proven wrong...
Ben
11/19/2016 01:32:11 pm
Links to the emails here
Reply
Ray Sherburn
11/19/2016 01:38:13 pm
How can i click the source material? Liberals need evidence to be shit up.
Reply
Leroy
11/19/2016 06:40:21 pm
Even with evidence. They just assume the defensive position of sticking their head in their ass
Reply
Jono
11/19/2016 08:22:26 pm
Source? 11/19/2016 07:24:30 pm
Why aren't the links available?
Reply
J.Meyer
11/22/2016 12:32:03 pm
Likely because most of the people in this room aren't literate enough to know how to operate a computer. It isn't a link, it's a text only address. I don't know if the intelligence level in these forums should encourage me or frighten me.
Hillary for prison 2016
11/21/2016 06:25:08 am
Try this like Ray Sherburn. Might help with the liberal evidence.
Reply
Andrew
11/19/2016 02:00:40 pm
Yes, these journalists colluded with the Clinton campaign by talking incessantly about her emails while covering ever Trump speech in full for months.
Reply
James H Freire
11/19/2016 02:02:30 pm
So who were the fake news folks who claimed WMD's? Who was fake when the story of Reagan's presidency does not include multiple embassy attacks and "borrowing" from S/S? How far back would you go before realizing the "news" has always been propaganda?
Reply
Helena
11/19/2016 06:40:42 pm
Since we did find WMD's, that point is invalid.
Reply
Carlos Chavarry
11/19/2016 09:21:49 pm
Helena, care to expand on your comment please?
JR
11/21/2016 12:07:05 am
"Since we did find WMD's, that point is invalid.
Kevin Brookshire
11/21/2016 04:41:46 am
"Since we did find WMD's, that point is invalid.
Son of Zebulun
11/20/2016 02:42:55 am
Texas son, I am guessing you mean Edward Bernays, for anyone who wants to look it up. I would recommend the documentary A Century of the Self -- long, but fascinating. It's probably on youtube.
Erik L
11/19/2016 02:05:16 pm
How about a list of the LEGITIMATE news sources so we know where we can go to find ACCURATE and TRUTHFUL information?
Reply
Teri
11/19/2016 02:35:16 pm
easy...PBS, BBC, and NPR radio
Reply
Moon
11/19/2016 02:51:28 pm
NPR? Surely you jest...
Charlie
11/19/2016 03:43:00 pm
I'm sorry, but you can't claim NPR as a reliable, accurate source. All I hear from them is the same liberal tripe I hear on the major networks.
Ray Adams
11/19/2016 04:03:34 pm
I am British and am 63 years old and have watched the BBC since 1960 and I can assure you that the BigBrotherCorporation BBC to you are the MOST important fake news purveyor in the world...if you want to deny this I relish your futile efforts!!!!
lynne
11/19/2016 04:19:27 pm
The BBC?? It's the British Bullshit Corporation,
Harry Flashman
11/19/2016 04:48:45 pm
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!
Regge Williams
11/20/2016 01:07:43 pm
PBS and NPR are totally biased and have reported fake news!
Jennifer
11/21/2016 12:59:41 am
Sorry. That's changed. The anti-propaganda law was repealed in 2013 giving legality to MSM propaganda.
hs
11/25/2016 08:51:25 am
The BBC? that bastion of government propaganda for every war the west has ever waged. I stopped believing it many moons ago. Stopped watching the night I saw them report on the 'poor soldiers' getting beaten up and thrown overboard from the peace fllotilla trying to get to Palestine. Out of interest the truth was that the activists were unarmed and at least one was threatened at gunpoint with a boot on his head.
Brad
11/19/2016 02:55:44 pm
Truth in media. Ben swan
Reply
gphx
11/19/2016 05:00:49 pm
ZeroHedge, Breitbart, DrudgeReport
Reply
Tim
11/19/2016 09:41:28 pm
zero hedge is spot on. from time to time a kook gets on but more often then not you'll never see most of what they publish in mainstream tv, paper or magazine. In addition they stay on a story and when they find they wrong they tell you straight up. Drudge is weird but similar to zh. For what ever reason I haven't gotten on breigbart. Maybe I should start now.
Charles Eldredge
11/20/2016 12:26:19 am
Bill Still...my fav REAL news reporter.
buck
11/20/2016 10:04:31 pm
INFOWars hosted by Alex Jones
Captain Trips
11/20/2016 01:42:41 am
Breitbart, Drudge Report, RT, Infowars...
Reply
.am
11/20/2016 01:38:06 pm
You MUST be kidding me. Breitbart, RT, Infowars?
Sailing Away
11/21/2016 12:18:56 am
"Breitbart, Drudge Report, RT, Infowars... " Agree - fake news sites to the nth degree. Jones is a major faketriot for prophet. I can't stand this fat fucker, wish somebody would sit on his face.
dogitydog
11/20/2016 01:44:35 am
It's a very short list
Reply
Darrell
11/20/2016 11:06:13 am
Trunews
Reply
bill demmon
11/20/2016 02:10:40 pm
cspan
Reply
Truth is in Research
11/22/2016 06:17:51 pm
It is up to you to verify ANY information coming from ANY source at ANY time. We have access to a wealth of verified information and resources and we are complicit in the propaganda machine if we are not willing to investigate all things from multiple resources ourselves. Even sites with a reputation for publishing accurate information have a propensity to be infiltrated by disinformation and false propaganda at any given time. Trust your intuition, cross-reference, and always consider all possibilities. People not willing to do that are the reason we got into this situation in the first place.
Reply
Susan
11/19/2016 02:07:10 pm
What about Nowthisnews and Newnownext? Any validity to them? I see a lot of social media traffic referencing articles from these sites.
Reply
Andy Chanak
11/19/2016 03:15:40 pm
How about Lester Holt, he was even featured in a anti Trump add. He should not be reading the news to anyone. Liberal bias, he and his buddy Chuck Todd.
Reply
Tim
11/19/2016 09:46:30 pm
No one can tell me different about Lester and chuck. Word I hear is they go down on each other when ever Hillary said so. Both are arrogant and quite gay.
Reply
k
11/20/2016 10:36:34 am
HAAA I agree! Both losers! He should 100% be on list!
Laurie
11/21/2016 03:44:14 pm
Matt Lauer should be on the list. His debate performance showed his bias by a mile. NBC should have Matt, Lester, Chuck and Savannah. That USED to be my favorite source for news. Now I can't trust that they are fair and unbiased. Each story has 2 sides and in this campaign season only Trump had a side, they never spoke about Hillary's emails, Benghazi, etc...
Reply
Mary
11/19/2016 03:30:25 pm
Not BBC either; they treated Nigel Farage the same as MSM treats Trump here.
Reply
Jason
11/19/2016 11:26:39 pm
I can add a dozen couple more news channel as well as newspapers in Canada, never reporting wikileaks or always being biased to Clinton and the U.S. while always bashing Trump and Russia on everything. People in Canada ended up believing in their own lies which is why they are still so shocked.
doctor_ew
11/19/2016 03:50:13 pm
Jon Allen hasn't been with Vox since 2015, would really like to be able to click these sources, not very impressed with this "sourced" list that doesn't let you check the sources.
Reply
Chris Johnson
11/19/2016 03:50:27 pm
Where is FOX News on this list guys? Seems a pretty obvious GLARING oversight .......
Reply
Nishanth
11/19/2016 05:27:55 pm
They are a Republican news channel and everyone knows that no point in trying there
Reply
Rick Trick
11/19/2016 09:34:43 pm
FOX doesn't qualify for this list. FOX may not get it right 100% of the time but they are the only news outlet that doesn't tow the Democrat party line.
Reply
Shawn
11/19/2016 10:49:56 pm
Still framing it as dem vs rep? Both are opposite sides of the same coin pulling strings towards the same end while screwing 'both' sides. Both sides have a line to be towed, and keeping the two fighting is an excellent distraction from the real puppetmasters
Mike S.
11/21/2016 02:43:57 pm
Obviously this source is biased as well. FOX doesn't qualify because they don't tow the Democratic line?
Jason
11/19/2016 11:32:55 pm
Please 'read' the title. Fox was not in collusion WITH the Clinton campaign.
Reply
Jay
11/19/2016 03:54:51 pm
I haven't trusted any media source in years. Even fox can get off the beaten track at time.
Reply
Reghar
11/19/2016 04:26:20 pm
Where can i find the list with the links working?
Reply
Rahger
11/19/2016 04:45:04 pm
The list can be found at www.inurpants.com
Reply
Nerdy
11/19/2016 06:47:13 pm
Reply
heidi
12/27/2016 12:48:20 am
I saw the original "list" with truth Dig and Truth Out listed on the list and NOT Democracy Now and The Intercept. Now I cannot find the original list. If you find it with the info I just listed PLEASE email it to me at hs4265@aol.com Thankyou!! That coward professor removed the list and it has been altered anywhere else I have found it without Truth Dig and Truth Out mentioned......!!!!
Reply
Chris
11/19/2016 04:40:49 pm
Awsome return shot Ron! Real Fire Power list. And it has the truth on its side although most of us already knew this its nice to see it all organized like this.
Reply
Richard Wicks
11/19/2016 04:58:41 pm
Mr Paul. I wrote you in 2006 as perhaps one of many, that asked you to please run for president in 2008. I donated the federal maximum to your campaign.
Reply
Leigh
11/19/2016 05:31:17 pm
I don't know why you would call out the fact that she is a "feminist" as if it were a bad thing. Leftist gives us an idea of her political views, but have you lumped all feminists into a negative connotation? I'm female and a feminist and generally middle of the road independent. You can be on the side of truth and still be a feminist, you can be feminist and NOT vote for Hillary Clinton or approve of abortion. I was disappointed that the person who wrote the linked article about the assistant professor attacked how long she has been in the position as an assistant professor. I by no means agree with what she has done as perpetuating misconceptions as far what people perceive to be illegitimate news sources, but come on. I've had enough of the name calling and efforts to downgrade people. There's nothing wrong or downgrading to society if one is a feminist. I feel sick that I have to make that clarification to you.
Reply
Josh
11/20/2016 12:09:56 am
Do you feel being called leftist is bad or negative too? I think it was a description of the persons viewpoints, not a negative attack.
Reply
Josh
11/20/2016 12:12:48 am
Correct me if I'm wrong though. I try to look at everything as unbiased as I can, but sometimes am blind to it.
Reply
Charles Eldredge
11/20/2016 12:34:01 am
The term feminist has gotten a very bad reputation. I think there is another name for independent women now...those who don't want to be associated with the poison of feminism....But I can't think of it now...It's late and I had 1 beer a little earlier.
Reply
Leeloo
11/20/2016 01:38:44 pm
I agree with you Leigh - and feel the same way. I don't like labels of any kind but I would for the most part be identified as a feminist because I believe that a woman is capable of doing whatever she sets out to do as any man and therefore be awarded equal opportunity to prove as any man would be given. I don't believe in abortion - as a choice for me - but I also believe that I don't have the right to FORCE my ideology on another woman - or on any other subject - a man. I will always, if asked, tell you my opinion and why and I will respect listening to someone else's - maybe even become passionate in my discussion - but I will never think that I am entitled to harm, imprison, bully or belittle anyone if they don't agree...What I see today that is happening with these protestors and Hilary supporters and anti-Trump proclamations takes on a personal hate behind the "Love Trumps Hate" signs...when Hilary announced she would run for President - I watched and was excited. As time passed and I watched the supporters become more like zealots and then all of craziness that followed I knew there was now way I could support this woman who had such a following of self righteous, intolerant, evasive people who actually believe their ideology entitles them to "kill" others who do not agree - the members of ISIS are very similar - wouldn't you say?
Reply
Mark
11/21/2016 01:08:48 am
Leeloo--Did you leave the last two letters off of your name? I'm quite certain you did and those letters are n and y. Yes Leeloony, what were you thinking when you said,
ccccccc
11/22/2016 10:50:14 pm
That's not being feminist. That's being an Independent Woman..most feminists hate men period. I've known a few and I thought they were insane. I am an Independent Woman. I would not consider myself feminist because I do not hate or discriminate against men or think they are all the same, etc.
jeff miller
11/19/2016 05:40:26 pm
I wish Trump would appoint you chairman of the Federal Reserve
Reply
Gowri
11/19/2016 06:34:58 pm
He is if he wants to take it. And shutdown the Banking Cartel Printing Press.
Reply
Jacqueline
11/19/2016 06:05:02 pm
Typo
Reply
Kevin
11/19/2016 06:56:44 pm
Snopes is a joke also !!!!
Reply
dopple
11/19/2016 06:57:50 pm
Here's where you can find the list with functional hyperlinks to the Wikileaks site:
Reply
dopple
11/19/2016 06:58:16 pm
Here's where you can find the list with functional hyperlinks to the Wikileaks site:
Reply
Or
11/19/2016 07:00:58 pm
Ron - you just delivered deathblow to system of illusions. I congratulate you pn that. Mr. Trump please let Ron be the constotunal compass to your presidency.
Reply
James Newton
11/19/2016 07:40:10 pm
Where is Fox news? They are just as fake, only for the right instead of left.
Reply
John
11/19/2016 08:18:02 pm
Can't click it. Fake and gay
Reply
karry
11/19/2016 08:22:19 pm
Great work thanks a lot !!!!
Reply
Craig
11/19/2016 10:10:35 pm
Yeah wasnt Fox the worat of all for lying us into the Iraq War? Arent they pushing Syria destabilization now, basically Iraq 2 with new techniques..? hmmmmm
Reply
Critic
11/19/2016 11:02:30 pm
Exactly my thought!! Funny how everyone's willing to rip one side apart, but they're not willing to be equally critical of the other side.
Reply
Charles Eldredge
11/20/2016 12:37:52 am
Fox is globalist and has plenty of propaganda, but I believe this list is of those who actually colluded with the Hillary campaign. But you are right...Fox is fake.
Critic
11/19/2016 11:01:53 pm
How the hell is Fox not on this list?!?! Come on guys, if we're going to show fake news, Fox definitely has to be at the top of that list.
Reply
Lol123
11/20/2016 12:12:17 am
And the truth shall set you (us) free!
Reply
dkmeller1
11/20/2016 12:26:50 am
The "establishment media" being the REAL fake news. I love it and this list really says it all.
Reply
Indian
11/20/2016 02:00:54 am
Do you have some of the Indian journalists data, who also wrote lies as usual as they did in India.
Reply
Indian
11/20/2016 02:04:02 am
Also the Political ones in India who must have colluded with the likes of Hillary and even acted on her interest to collude with terrorists and criminals to make the life of Indians miserable? We do have a feeling that there are politicians and media personalities in India paid by the Clinton. So please publish all the details of these corrupt so that the people in India know and they could alteast be saved from the danger further. Let the world be much more peaceful. Thank you very much.
Reply
dogitydog
11/20/2016 02:02:34 am
Funny how things have changed. Remember when the New York Times was the source for reliable news and Pravda was the propaganda machine? Pravda has become a legitimate news source and New York Times is now the source for propaganda.
Reply
Eduard
11/20/2016 03:31:49 am
https://youtu.be/U2cdsh0OiPc
Reply
Josh
11/20/2016 03:33:49 am
END THE FED
Reply
11/20/2016 10:32:59 pm
LET'S GET RID OF THE ROTHCHILD INTERNATIONAL BANKING EMPIRE WHICH CONTROLS MOST OF THE BANKS ON EARTH AND THEY ALSO CONTROL THE UNITED STATES BECAUSE THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS THE ROTHCHILD BANKING EMPIRE BRANCH IN THE UNITED STATES. WE MUST RID AMERICA OF THEIR POISON AND KICK THAT LYING BITCH, JANET YELLEN OUT OF THE UNITED STATES.
Reply
Charles
11/20/2016 04:04:52 am
how about this, give us a list of the real truth news reporters and it will make our lives more simple.
Reply
William
11/20/2016 04:55:55 am
Can you do a list of fake news about Donald Trump's so called truth when it's all editting and behind the curtain/behind the scenes. I know Fox News is dead on number one but i'm sure Fox News is not alone either.
Reply
Beth Martin
11/20/2016 05:29:15 am
Please "fix" your fake news list so the Wikileaks "sourcing" works. Some of those journalists were John Podesta's "dinner guests". George Stephanopolous was a Clinton Foundation donor. John Harwood e-mailed Podesta about how his reports appeared, etc. It's on wikileaks, you need to go back. Try ZeroHedge.
Reply
Joseph Saviano
11/20/2016 09:06:07 am
A very informative list. Doesn't surprise me just home many people from CNN and MSNBC are on this list. Why else is CNN know as the "Clinton News Network"?
Reply
Michael
11/20/2016 10:10:01 am
Yep, take the bait, once again. Same BS machine, different cover.
Reply
11/20/2016 11:12:33 am
This was received and posted on jimstone.is (82.221.129.208) and claimed to be sent by a Wikileaks employee. It claims they were taken down via an unforeseen exploit. This was sent during a gag order and may have cost his life, but he did so to protect others from the honey pot trap that is the now CIA Wikileaks site. Jim is truthful and the very best investigator. 82.221.129.208/wikileaksconfirmed.gif
Reply
William Bourne
11/20/2016 11:18:58 am
This was received and posted on jimstoneDOTis and claimed to be sent by a Wiki.leaks employee. It claims they were taken down via an unforeseen exploit. This was sent during a gag order and may have cost his life, but he did so to protect others from the CIA honey pot trap on their site. 82.221.129.208/wikileaksconfirmed.gif
Reply
LastNameFirstInitial
11/20/2016 11:33:50 am
TIL Fox News is a reliable source 😂😂
Reply
Ciara Puentes
11/20/2016 11:57:13 am
En todas esas justa lista de mentirosos y manipuladores falta incluir una cadena muy importante q ejerse influencia en el mundo hispano sobre todo en el sur de la florida y se llama univision encabesados por jorge ramos y maria elena salinas artifises de la manipulasion y los disturbios sociales. Si queremos ser justos debemos incluirlos porq ellos mantienen una postura antinacionalistas.
Reply
11/20/2016 12:12:47 pm
You missed listing the entire LA Times editorial staff and every contributor!
Reply
Janet Peters
11/20/2016 01:16:55 pm
Surely there are more "journalists" from NBC than just Savannah Guthrie?
Reply
11/20/2016 01:29:14 pm
Thank you very much for your efforts to promote and protect liberty. Keep up the good work!
Reply
Snowy Smith South Africa
11/20/2016 02:12:42 pm
President Donald Trump must appoint a Media OMBUDSMAN to investigate all complaints against the MEDIA.
Reply
Snowy Smith South Africa
11/20/2016 02:12:58 pm
President Donald Trump must appoint a Media OMBUDSMAN to investigate all complaints against the MEDIA.
Reply
Snowy Smith South Africa
11/20/2016 02:14:36 pm
President Donald Trump must appoint a Media OMBUDSMAN to investigate all complaints against the MEDIA.
Reply
scobra
11/20/2016 03:24:00 pm
thanks for the great work.
Reply
Randall
11/20/2016 04:23:08 pm
The irony of complaining about bad journalism with an unsourced image of a list of journalists is so amazingly rich. An image of links to "WikiLeaks" as the source? How about actual links to the mail dumps, or maybe a link to the source of this list where presumably such links to sources are actual links and not just images of blue text?
Reply
James Owers
11/23/2016 10:47:52 am
Indeed, quite ironic. It also appears not to be very credible I'm afraid.
Reply
Coba
11/20/2016 04:33:26 pm
I know RT is state owned but seem to be doing a good job of providing different news. eg: are white hats legit? Asking pressing questions about Syria. Interesting to hear alternate narrative. Any opinions on credibility of RT?
Reply
Andrew Vyse
11/20/2016 04:41:28 pm
Sorry, I would take this list seriously if some Fox News anchors and reporters were included.
Reply
argentarii
11/20/2016 05:35:03 pm
Well done! It's a pity it's not a comprehensive list including all the LIES we have been given by so many news outlets for decades (don't forget the BBC and other European mouthpieces.)
Reply
TJ Roberts
11/20/2016 06:29:13 pm
True Patriot. Have been following you since 2005. I am a big-time AJ, DK, Matt Drudge fan. You are all heroes. Carry on, and lead!
Reply
11/20/2016 07:10:14 pm
Well done sir, yes, people were already sick and disgusted with this sources of sewage "news". I think is time to rid the media of this brand misinforming feces with corporal interests, not people's interests.
Reply
Kenta
11/20/2016 07:29:39 pm
Big thanks from Japan. Jap media had been just copying and pasting these fake news from some of these guys instead of conducting journalism by themselves. All lost face.
Reply
tom
11/20/2016 08:12:39 pm
I cant disagree with the names on this list, but not one from fox news. I know fox didn't side with Hillary during the campaign, but they did say the same things about the Iraq war. sean Hannity and bill o'reilly both liars I'm just saying
Reply
Dumbfounded
11/20/2016 08:56:41 pm
What about KATIE COURIC?
Reply
Dan
11/20/2016 09:00:01 pm
That's why Fox news, especially O'Rilley, is so trusted. When he has an opinion he tells you it is an Opinion and even asks for your opinion: which he is willing to debunk.
Reply
Mick Savage
11/20/2016 09:50:44 pm
I'm glad to see Ron Paul keeps at it.
Reply
x_SoulSearcher_x
11/20/2016 10:06:21 pm
So where's the list? A picture isn't a list! Are we supposed ot post a picture as proof? That doesn't work for me. Post the list!
Reply
11/20/2016 10:14:04 pm
DIANE SAWYER IS A MWMBER OF THE COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELAYTIONS.
Reply
Cow tipper
11/20/2016 10:27:20 pm
Ron needs to add himself to this list. He is lying that "no" or zero WMD were found in Iraq. Dozens and dozens of soldiers were exposed and treated for exposure to such weapons. Multiple special forces soldiers have testified in their own books about seeing WMD. The UN has on its site the 500 tons of yellow cake. We removed it. And we have found thousands of old WMD shells and rockets in Iraq. They were old stock, not new because Saddam froze all development of new weapons because he knew he could restart WMD weaponization fairly quickly. RON quit lying to the American people you profess to be serving. Your not doing us a service acting like a freakin democrat.
Reply
JR
11/21/2016 12:14:24 am
What bullshit you write. You're definitely another one of these couch-surfing agent provacateurs trying to make more unsubstantiated claims. The liar here is YOU. F'n moron.
Reply
RichW
11/21/2016 10:38:59 am
Cow tipper just scratched the surface. There are multiple accounts of WMD found in Iraq but the media dismissed them all as "abandoned" to protect the "Bush Lied" narrative. "American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs." The troops were ordered to keep such discoveries secret. One example: reported by Dana Ford of CNN in article "United States kept secret its chemical weapons finds in Iraq" - enough WMD to kill hundreds of thousands.
RichW
11/21/2016 10:44:17 am
"A former Iraqi general alleges that in June 2002 Saddam Hussein transported weapons of mass destruction out of the country to Syria aboard several refitted commercial jets, under the pretense of conducting a humanitarian mission for flood victims." Article by By Sherrie Gossett of CNS February 2, 2006. The general is one of several sources confirming this. Angry at Bush, the mainstream media avoided these stories.
busseja
11/20/2016 11:04:19 pm
He should have printed the names in YELLOW.
Reply
David
11/20/2016 11:07:12 pm
For this list to have any practical use and validity, it would be set up so you can click on the "source" after the name and pull up the specific, relevant Wikileaks emails or other evidence to support the "fake" assertion.
Reply
Topcat
11/20/2016 11:09:55 pm
You mean fox/faux is for real...bs article
Reply
JR
11/21/2016 12:12:26 am
Wow - a CLASSIC example of "attack the messenger" to distract from the content of the message. You people are unbelievably stupid. What news source on the so-called original Fake News list isn't a fraud?
Reply
11/21/2016 03:46:48 am
One of the biggest fake news organizations mentioned in wikileaks but omitted from the above list is the Boston Globe.
Reply
Eli Wood
11/21/2016 05:50:10 am
Surely Anderson Cooper should be on this list. I can think of numerous examples.
Reply
Lars Mars
11/21/2016 05:55:37 am
You forgot Glenn Beck. That fake shill for the global order is still at it telling America to "give up" and not fight for our freedom.
Reply
11/21/2016 06:12:12 am
Thank you for following up on this. I stopped watching these networks a long time ago. I am just happy to see that we have a chance for a change from the establishment.
Reply
Guy Jordan
11/21/2016 06:35:31 am
Where are the list of NBC helpers of Hillary like Chuck "Chuckles" Todd, the ringmaster of the once-venerable "Meet the Press?" Where's Jake "The Jackass" Tapper of CNN, another Hillary foot massager?
Reply
Padre
11/21/2016 06:49:59 am
Now we need only add the fake news from the right. As much as I am inclined to hear that bias we need to be careful not to allow the same sort of echo chamber to surround us. God knows thats why so many were so disappointed by the Romney loss in 12 and Trumps victory may have been talked up by some on Fox but I believe few of them had the real investigative research to support their claims. They go lucky and now will claim the were prescient.
Reply
wilson hk
11/21/2016 07:04:41 am
what is this ridiculous jpg or jpeg
Reply
11/21/2016 07:48:08 am
This list misses some of the greatest propaganda channels on the planet like the BBC that no right minded person could possibly watch with a straight face these days, nor for at least the last 20 years. ALL of the main countries in the EU have government owned propaganda agencies such as the BBC that push propaganda in a never ending stream of lies into people's homes. I hope when Trump get's into the White House he will set up Radio Free Europe to tell people in Western Europe of the lies being told by their globalist "elites" so we too can get rid of them.
Reply
OtoyaYamaguchi
11/21/2016 07:56:10 am
You forgot the worst one, the one we taxpayers are robbed to fund, the ENTIRE cast of National Pinko Radio.
Reply
11/21/2016 08:04:13 am
Nature of the beast! Ignorance does not have to be permanent, but if cultivated can evolve into stupidity aka democrat/republicrat/communist.
Reply
11/21/2016 08:35:28 am
Don't take Wikileaks word for it - rate it yourselves. SPINRANKER’s mission is to provide the public-at-large a platform to rate and discuss the political bias of media, journalists and opinion-makers.
Reply
11/21/2016 08:36:59 am
Don't take Wikileaks word for it - rate it yourselves. spinranker.com
Reply
tammy Mackay
11/21/2016 08:37:16 am
Let's hope some of the websites/internet news providers are colluders with the dems and Clintons get identified as FAKE!!!!!
Reply
BRUSSELS BASHER
11/21/2016 08:48:02 am
The BBC is king of them all ,the others take their lead from them, it has been in the hands of the marxist chattering classes for more than half a century, they espouse every anti British ,anti Western issue instinctively from mass immigration and the global warming nonsense, to the slavish support of every EU diktat.
Reply
Zagreus66
11/21/2016 09:37:25 am
Why do some people in this thread ask for "sources" when the most accurate and trustworthy source is your own eyes and ears! I have watched these criminals (formerly called journalists) on TV, I have read their faux articles, I have heard their constant lies with my own ears. Source: two of my five senses: sight and hearing.
Reply
seagrape
11/21/2016 09:39:10 am
I didn't see Obama's name on this list. Of course, he isn't a journalist but he constantly repeated the lies about "keeping your doctor" and "premiums will go down".
Reply
JeffC
11/21/2016 10:03:30 am
ABC, CBS, NBC & CNN colluded with the DNC and Clinton Campaign? ....REALLY?????? Impossible I say.....they represent trusted and respected institutions!....Must be lies from the vast right-wing conspiracy. If it was really true, they would be fired, right? (tongue firmly in cheek)
Reply
Arec Bardwin
11/21/2016 10:12:54 am
"A republic, if you can keep it."
Reply
11/21/2016 10:58:38 am
hello, without active links, I don't feel right about forwarding this list ... so many of my friends are "doubters" , that they wouldn't believe even if these people came out and admitted it!
Reply
Snowy Smith South Africa
11/21/2016 11:00:50 am
THE ENEMY:
Reply
heidi
12/27/2016 12:52:10 am
Ok, Ive had it with your jew hating comments. You are reported now you filthy anti semite.
Reply
Antodav
11/21/2016 11:01:59 am
🙄 The far-right's anti-intellectualism continues…
Reply
MyneGaim
11/21/2016 11:51:42 am
If anti-intellectualism includes outing reporters who provide debate questions ahead of the debate.. count me in. Proud to be anti-intellectual. Are you proud to be a cheat?
Reply
Myne Gaim
11/21/2016 11:49:54 am
Mr Paul, in any profession that places the populace at risk, a board license is required. We see this with pilots, physicians, and attorneys. Flatly put, these people affect the safety and well being of the populace and therefore Examining Boards are in place to monitor their actions. These boards are typically private not public, such as the American Board of Internal Medicine. They are typically lucrative as well and lastly, they serve to provide the practitioner with proof that they are legitimate.
Reply
J. cheevers
11/21/2016 12:09:30 pm
Thanks so much for publishing this list. Everyone i talk to is mad that the press seemingly has gotten away with this massive lying campaign. Maybe now we can have some long overdue justice.
Reply
Robert
11/21/2016 01:25:56 pm
This is awesome. Thanks for pointing this out. Of course, this site will soon be listed as "fake news" by those arbiters of truth, WaPo and NYT.
Reply
11/21/2016 01:42:06 pm
At last -- this list is long overdue and I sincerely thank the author -- now at least we have a reference point -- many of us already had noticed the reality of the 'mass media,' but now all those interested have a source. My thanks.
Reply
Phil Cooper
11/21/2016 01:42:45 pm
The list posted her is but a small fraction of Fake News reporters, and it seems to omit Fake News editors and assistant editors and publications that slavishly promoted and defended Hillary Clinton since 2014.
Reply
Lehni
11/21/2016 01:45:55 pm
For the record, the Bush Administration (Cheney and the CIA) created the false "intelligence" that they leaked to the media regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Bush wanted the war and he was willing to deliberately generate falsehoods and feed them to the American People and his Sec'y of Sate Colin Powell. Powell, integrity intact, resigned when he realized he had been duped to lie to Congress and the American people. Will you have the openness and guts to print this comment?
Reply
Trico
11/21/2016 02:20:33 pm
Mainstream Media Fake & Faked News
Reply
The liberal media is full of lazy,dreamworld idiots that cannot think for themselves and do not care about the freedom that has been bought with lives to allow us to be free. The left is also living in a dream world and not reality. They are snivvling cowards. They do recognize the reality of this world and what they could be if they were not idolizing an idilogy that does not work Trump has exposed the left abd the facts are in front of their face and they cannot see it So sad So sad Tom
Reply
Christopher Pearson
11/21/2016 04:12:07 pm
Fake News as journalistic false flag
Reply
John Wirts
11/21/2016 05:02:07 pm
I am all for the first amendment protecting the right to free speech, especally for the NEWSMEDIA. But proprangda rags twisting the truth to support in power political hacks, especally when they lie about their supported politicians to make them reelectable, and slander the opposition and misconstrue their position and philosophy. If the indoctrination centers and proprangda mills had to stick to truth or be held legally aand civilly accountable, This country could return to the GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD.
Reply
11/21/2016 05:17:06 pm
If you want news go to EWTN at 6 p.m. Eastern Time. This is the Catholic Daily News and I find that Brian Philips gives the news that is up to date and I trust what I hear.
Reply
Tammy
11/21/2016 05:53:35 pm
forgot Megan Kelly
Reply
Reggie Scruggs
11/21/2016 05:54:31 pm
Forgot NPR which is a non-stop cheerleading squad for Crooked Hillary et al.
Reply
Sarah Jenkins
11/21/2016 07:45:36 pm
I clicked on the "it is sourced" link and found your wikileaks links.
Reply
DR Richard
11/21/2016 08:56:19 pm
Scum sucking sycophants --all of them---I do not watch any of this --all bullshit and no TV anymore --no newspapers --never bought-- all bs and nothing new---waste your life away reading and watching lies and rumours and crate stress to shorten your life
Reply
11/21/2016 10:22:52 pm
"When old Doctor Paul read the writing on the wall out loud, it was the perfect crime.. he called it bad information.." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHtCkMzezAk
Reply
P
11/22/2016 12:32:55 am
missed Megyn Kelly.. Fox News.. everyone but Hannity and Judge Pirro , they are all biased.. Trump needs to just hire his own Reporters for Trump Tv or just use Pirro. Hannity or even Dennis Michael Lynch! #DumpTheBiasedMedia
Reply
Kari
11/22/2016 08:46:09 am
Bravo Dr. Ron Paul for authentically calling MSM out on their own spin/lies and deceit. About time MSM was held accountable for their "hit pieces and propaganda". We need to keep updating this list and post it publicly in order to hold MSM accountable. That is the reason the majority of us refer to the internet news sources and alternative news as enough is enough of MSM dumbing down of humanity.
Reply
Sue Tabor
11/22/2016 10:42:26 am
These sources give journalists a bad name. They stink!
Reply
CantBePc Anymore
11/22/2016 12:04:18 pm
I can't believe how rude people are to each other. Just because you don't know them and you're not speaking face to face? A lot of these comments are totally uncalled for.
Reply
anna
11/22/2016 01:58:07 pm
this is literally all BS and you can't even click on the alleged "sourced links" - it's clearly a list that was created to try and convince good Americans that the world renowned non partisan news sites where actual information can be gotten is fake. It's really upsetting.
Reply
James Owers
11/23/2016 10:44:42 am
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5cb4hl/drain_the_swamp_here_are_45_journalists_who_were/
Reply
Holden Faweva
11/22/2016 03:48:00 pm
"Anger Over a Film Fuels Anti-American Attacks in Libya and Egypt" And all the MSM's magnificent investigative journalism had that figured out and corrected within what? Never? It's a good thing Congress (Gowdy), Judicial Watch and Wikileaks still do some serious investigation!
Reply
James Owers
11/23/2016 10:27:53 am
What is the source for this image? Is it this reddit post from a few days before your article: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5cb4hl/drain_the_swamp_here_are_45_journalists_who_were/ ?
Reply
Nick
11/23/2016 10:33:03 am
Thanks James - doing god's work!
Reply
Jean-Victor COTE
11/23/2016 02:30:40 pm
Who's to tell if Wikileaks is a source of fake news or not?
Reply
11/25/2016 11:49:12 am
Since we know these "media assets" serve the Deep State oligarchy, which includes both Republicans and Democrats, we know using a left/right paradigm to describe MSM malfeasance is incorrect.
Reply
Daniel
11/26/2016 11:54:45 am
I think this site is censoring or deleting comments, because I commented a few weeks ago and my comment is no longer listed.
Reply
Depose Debauched Despots
11/26/2016 03:30:55 pm
What? Only about 50 professional LIARS among the PNNs?
Reply
Ed LaPinskas
11/27/2016 09:43:29 pm
Since I have not watched any "net-work" 'nooz' for about 40 years, I have to believe that I have a leg up on most of the American citizen voters
Reply
Ibebrenda
12/6/2016 08:53:43 am
You should be ashamed of yourself! You KNOW that they are highly respected, credible journalist. In your desire to spread fake news to amplify your narrative, you are undermining Democracy. When Americans have no where to go for "truth," they won't trust ANY source, including Ron Paul. This is how the Russians undermined our election. The USSR fell quickly, our democracy can, too.
Reply
paul
12/8/2016 11:28:29 am
Y'all are nuts. Congratulations on your win. Good luck with it.
Reply
Noel Doherty
1/7/2017 04:34:56 pm
Ron I think you have listed all the news providers New Zealand sources our news from that's why we are a little backward down under.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
RSS Feed