This girl is a PERFECT example of the problem - she's soooo eager to fix the problem she doesn't want to bother with the cause of the problem. america is feeling the sting after kicking the hornets nest for decades. you want terrorism to end??? THEN STOP BEING A TERRORIST NATION.
Its amazing how contorted the argument can get to avoid blame and avoid accepting the root cause of the mess in the middle-east. "Blowback" is a term coined by the CIA. This journalist, like so many other journalists and politicians, would have us believe that the term is nonsensical. The CIA knows better. Sensible people know better.
This "blowback" is essential in the CIA's eyes so they can perpetuate wars foreverrrrrrrrrrrr more. VOTE OUT LIFER CONGRESSMEN
What I particularly annoying is that she professes to be a libertarian and sounds like a statist.
"Somewhere in the middle, that's where the truth lies." No. It's not.
The truth is that bombing people is almost universally bad idea.
The interviewer here was just plain awful. It's the usual high volume, aggressive nonsense that plagues modern "journalism."
Ron Paul is exactly right and despite her attempts at being dismissive I really appreciate that he stuck in there and just stuck to the root of the problem. There are 1.6 billion Muslims on the planet and Islam was the cultural center of the west for CENTURIES. Desperate people will use religion as a weapon because you NEED to believe a god is on your side when you're living in huts and your enemy has an army of flying robots.
How can she say "regardless of how we got there" ... how in the world can you solve ANY problem without looking into 'how we got there'?!
I think the interviewer is a bit self-absorbed, she doesn't want even to think that the actions of the government is not necessarily based on her own beliefs and principles. You don't need to be defensive all the time especially when the concept you are defending is wrong and is not even yours.
But I like how in the end she doesn't let him speak, mentions his son, and closes the interview. The rudest thing you could do in a debate/interview.
This girl is just stupid. The blowback is everything. Stupid btch
She sounds like she was given a position to take and had to stick to that idea. She wasn't even open to talking about the ideas Ron was mentioning. She sounded very closed and ignorant in a way. Ron is looking at a way bigger picture/perspective on this and really hangs to cure the root problems. She wouldn't even have a conversation, just kept throwing up her one position. Ron, solid work. Great thoughts.
Ron Paul: the problem is we are intervening and that is causing blow back
Reporter: we can't keep liking back how can we move forward?
Ron Paul: well look at France they just started bombing last months and this is directly from that it's retaliation...
Reporter again we need to move forward how do we do that?
UMMMM HELLOOOP HE JUST TOLD YOU HOW... Stop bombing people.. Have t people notice the more you "fight" terrorism the more it grows? Because all we are doing is just creating more radicals... We are making orphans that ISIS can use to add to their armies...
Ron you are so right ! , she si young and has to obey fox orders, Thanks for your clear explanatios.
Yes she is young. I felt like i was watching a seasoned, intelligent man trying to debate with a child who can only see her viewpoint.
It is sad that so many (in the "west") can not put themselves in the shoes of the people that are daily bombed in the Middle East. How would she react if drones killed her brother, mother and boyfriend without any of them doing anything to deserve it - other that being born in an area that is constantly bombed and destroyed?? I would swore revenge or die trying. What would YOU do? Stop the bombing other nations right now. that goes to NATO, US, Russia and everyone else interfering in Africa and the middle east.
Can't anyone see it? That woman is an expert at making it look like she is winning an argument in the eyes of stupid people.
Half the people in the world have lower than average intelligence. She is manipulating these people.
The bitch was communicating a message of righteous indignation to stupid people with her body language and tone. Stupid people are like the family pet they do not understand all the words and ideas. The family pet will relate more to the person that is the most emotional or loud.
I am not saying she is stupid. She is very smart and skilled. She manages the perceptions of the stupid people.
Stupid humans are attracted to righteous indignation, scorn and volume. They are not attracted to smart ideas delivered in a mild mannered polite way. It is too difficult to stay focused. Paul was spewing things that were impossible for stupid people to wrap their heads around. Paul is adept at communicating with smart people.
I suspect the woman has no real feelings or opinions on the issues. I hope she is compensated greatly for such soulless work.
Paul has to simplify his message. Also, he should have expressed the feelings that he had for that woman instead of being the kindly old gentlemen. He cannot play nice when he is going against monsters like her.
she has got no inteligents just repeating herself .thats what thhe pupets does.masters voice and movements.thats what isthe controlled media for you..same all around the world.CNN FOX TV BBC AL CAZIRE